#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gibson Generation Collection: G-200 Super Jumbo Single Cutaway
Hello, I've read that G-200s have a thinner body to make playing it more comfortable. Have any of you found that this significantly diminishes its volume and projection? There's none near me that I can try.
Product L I N K |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I get it, there is a market for all price points. Gibson is finally trying to get some of that money. It's business. Just know the G series in no way compares to a real J-200. Much like the walnut series. My dad fell for this. Buying a $3500 walnut 200. And is now disappointed that it doesn't sound as good as his L-4 flat top. Gotta say, I agree. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If you look at used Gibsons at GC, you see a lot of G series Gibsons in like new condition. That's not a good sign.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I am sorry and while it may be petty, if this model has that plastic sheet rock screw in the tail block others in that line have it tells me all I need to know about the workmanship which goes into them. You would be better off seeking out one of Bozeman's first budget line WM series guitars from the late-1990s and early-2000s.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I had a G-45 and it was thinner. I just couldn't get used to it. I also got half of what I paid for it on the trade. On the other hand, I just sold my Larrivee and got back what I paid for it two years ago- and I was selling it for much cheaper than they are going for now. I now have a J-45. I can say that it is head and shoulders above the G-45 that I had. I would save your money and get the SJ-200 if that's what you really want. Get an Eastman in the meantime. They are much better than any G series you will find.
|