#16
|
|||
|
|||
Both the OM-28V and the 000-18GE are really good guitars and good values, I think. If you flipped a coin, heads for the OM-28V, tails for the 000-18GE and made your decision this way, you would probably be happy, regardless.
Do you like mahogany backed guitars or rosewood? I tend to like rosewood, but many like the clarity and lack of metallic chime with mahogany. Do you like short scale (24.9" on the 000-18GE) or longer scale (25.4" on the OM-28V)? The short scale is a little more comfortable to play if you don't have big hands, but the longer scale has slightly higher string tension to create the same notes and so sounds a little more punchy. For fingerstyle playing, a lot of people like the softer sound of the strings on a short-scale guitar. Do you like the mod-V neck on the 000-18GE or the shallower neck on the OM-28V? I prefer the shallower neck but I still own a guitar with the mod-V neck. I just adapt. If I were in your shoes, I would play a bunch of Martins at a guitar store just to get a feel for what you like in answering the above questions. Otherwise, you could just flip that coin and see what you get. Back about 45-50 years ago, that's really how most of us bought guitars. We had no idea what we were doing and we simply got used to whatever it was we bought and learned from that. And there's nothing wrong with that approach. Sometimes too many things to think about just makes things too complicated. What did I do with that coin?.... - Glenn
__________________
My You Tube Channel |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks guys! I appreciate every one of your inputs here!
rmyAddison, I was leaning toward the OM-28V but your post threw me a bit. Having owned both, your post carries much value to me, also because blues and bare fingered fingerstyle is becoming my main pursuit. I do think the OM-28V will do that quite well too though... :-/ I do only have the capacity for one traditional "high-end" Martin, so I guess I'm still leaning very slightly OM-28V. The adirondack top and bracing of the 000-18GE entices me though, from everything I've heard. If the 000-18GE had sitka, I would probably go for the OM-28V much easier. Ok, so let me state some "features" I'd like (some are contradictory):
Some of these are ticked better by the 000-18GE and some better by the OM-28V. Haha, seems like I need one of each. Oh crap
__________________
Martins: 000-28VS (2011), 00-28G (1959) Gibsons: Advanced Jumbo Historic Reissue (2004), Songwriter Deluxe (2015), L-50 Archtop (1960s) Other: Breedlove Revival OMR Deluxe, The Loar L0-16 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Yep. (Cue l-o-n-g evil laugh here: Bwa-ha-ha-haaaaaaaa!)
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
That's a tough call but with either guitar you have a winner? I still have a 000-18GE and probably should have kept my OM-28V as well? I think you already stated the obvious answer...get both!
__________________
Jim Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've found the solution!!
I buy the OM-28V, cause it's a classic and a bit more versatile... And then, after not too much saving, I buy one of these: (I like the sound in these clips more than many 000-18GE clips I've heard) Adirondack over mahogany with golden era specs!
__________________
Martins: 000-28VS (2011), 00-28G (1959) Gibsons: Advanced Jumbo Historic Reissue (2004), Songwriter Deluxe (2015), L-50 Archtop (1960s) Other: Breedlove Revival OMR Deluxe, The Loar L0-16 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
And I agree with Jim. Because I now own his OM-28V. And I'm glad he didn't keep it because I probably would not have come to love the sound, the tone, the playabiity and the beauty of the OM-28V. I visited the Martin factory last fall and played several high-end Martin guitars. None of them surpasses the exquisite qualities of the OM-28V. I will own this guitar until the day I pass from this existence.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You can't go wrong with the OM-28V, or the 000-18GE, though. Amazing guitars. You'll be happy either way, I'd wager.
__________________
Treenewt |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, so I found a 000-18GE to try locally - and it was one of the best acoustics I've ever played, so lightly built and resonant, it was brand new but sounded like an vintage guitar.
The dynamic range was godlike! The only other acoustics I've played "in this league" also had adirondack tops, so maybe that's my answer? I played a HD-28 recently and felt nothing for it. And since the OM-28Vs are sometimes described as mini dreads, maybe I won't like them so much then?
__________________
Martins: 000-28VS (2011), 00-28G (1959) Gibsons: Advanced Jumbo Historic Reissue (2004), Songwriter Deluxe (2015), L-50 Archtop (1960s) Other: Breedlove Revival OMR Deluxe, The Loar L0-16 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Every time I play Adirondack over mahogany I remind myself what I like in a guitar. So simple and fundamental. It is always a palate cleanser!
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned examples of each over the years and have extensive playing time with them. It's hard to beat a 000-18GE all things considered.
__________________
Guitars: Martin 00-28; Martin Custom 00-28K; Martin 000-15M; Martin D-10; Martin D-41; Gibson 1939 L-00; Gibson L-00 Rosewood Studio; Gibson J-35; Fender Stratocaster, Telecaster Deluxe; Gibson Les Paul Junior. Others. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I played my 000-18GE for the first time in a while (OM-18A taking most of my lap time?) and I remembered why I bought it originally. Great guitar and maybe a better fingerstyle guitar (at least for me?) than the Authentic. My 000-18GE is so responsive and articulate.
__________________
Jim Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks guys, that does help... Even more towards the 000-18GE now
__________________
Martins: 000-28VS (2011), 00-28G (1959) Gibsons: Advanced Jumbo Historic Reissue (2004), Songwriter Deluxe (2015), L-50 Archtop (1960s) Other: Breedlove Revival OMR Deluxe, The Loar L0-16 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Jim Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated! |
|
Tags |
golden era, martin 000-18, martin om-28v, vintage series |
|