#1
|
|||
|
|||
Martin synthetics...why?
Why does Martin use Micarta on their lower end stuff?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Hi BenDial...
To make money by selling guitars to the lower end of the market. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That said, the 16 Series is Martin's R&D platform, where they can try new technologies (M&T neck joint, Micarta, new bracing patterns, etc) without upsetting the traditionalists too much. I'm guessing they started using Micarta in an effort to find a sustainable substitute for Ebony. Oddly enough, it works just fine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I think Randal is right, there has been quite a bit of press recently about the major guitar makers (Taylor, Martin, Gibson) CEOs partnering with Greenpeace, others on conservation activities, protection of forests, etc.. Martin has been (i think) perhaps a bit more out front of the pack in terms of trying to "mainstream" alternative materials.
I've got a mini-Martin that I think is all composite--great little guitar. I suspect that Martin's hoping that once people try it and see that it sounds pretty good, the acceptance will build. I'm actually surprised electric manufacturer's haven't been more engaged in alternative materials. Bill |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sure there has to be an economic component to it. To be able to reach a lower price point and widen the availability of a "Martin" guitar ( or whatever) to more people who are always looking for "cheaper", shortcuts and substitutes in manufacturing and materials have to be explored. Solid wood guitars are getting increasingly harder to make any cheaper. Purists disdain the 'counter-top' Martins, but I have played several that sounded very good.
__________________
. _________________________________ "A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy." --Samuel Adams |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have a Martin 00CX-AE, which is some kind of composite material. I think it's nice that they are experimenting with new materials, but I did have some serious problems with warping of the soundboard on this guitar that required sending it back to the factory for repair. That's the problem with the new and experimental designs, I guess.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
composite materials
I personally wouldn't (and haven't) flinch(ed) over a micarta fingerboard or bridge. Entire instruments are being made of petroleum products and plastic derivatives, and I think they sound and perform quite well. I've owned two different CA Guitars in the past, and I liked them every bit as much as the handmades I've had built with traditional woods, etc. Different...sure...but not necessarily "better" or "worse." Just different.
Brent |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In the overall scheme of a guitar, I don't think anyone feels that the fingerboard material has much to do with how the guitar sounds anyway. I think the reason Martin uses Micarta is this - it works. And economically.
__________________
Taylor 714e Breedlove Revival OM-R Martin 0000-18GE |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Used to think it was cheap until....
I did some research here and elsewhere and found economics isn't the only facror or even major issue. These materials can are very stable, durable, readily available, and more importantly they work well. I used to beat on Martin for stepping outside of the traditional boundaries that some dealers used against competition. At a time in history there were some vocal devoted "Martinites" bashing other companies with nontradional designs as being inferior. Now in modern day there are still traditionalists out there but their views are expressed more as personal preferences.
Having said that and being very critical myself, I now own a 000-16SGT with micarta fretboard and bridge. Plays, sounds, and looks great. I also own a Little Martin LXM Java with HPL top back and sides. I actually preferred the tone of the HPL top vs. the spruce(seemed warmer to me). Like the 000-16 it plays, sounds, and looks great. As long as they meet those criteria is addition to being stable I'm OK with it. Now I'm ready to go buy a carbon fiber guitar but I won't I wouldn't consider it. Just my 2cents.
__________________
Martin 000-28EC, Taylor 12fret Cedar/Mahogany, Taylor GC8, Carvin AC275, Takamine TC135SC, Yamaha APX5na |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Cost is not the driving factor for using Micarta. It's a proprietary product that's more expensive than Indian rosewood, Macassar ebony, or whatever wood they're using on the low-end Martin fretboards these days. Martin has long considered the 16 series its "test market" series, which is why it got the hybrid A-frame/X bracing, the mortise and tenon neck joint (which was extended to all the lower series) and the Micarta fretboard and bridge.
I wasn't a fan of Micarta at first and I'm still a little put off from an aethetic standpoint, but it's proven to be stable and durable, making it an excellent and ecological alternative to ebony or rosewood.
__________________
Chris We all do better when we all do better. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, not only has micarta proven to be an excellent material for fingerboards, It is NOT necessarilly cheaper than ebony/rosewood. I think I read that somewhere.
__________________
If it ain't never been in a pawn shop, it can't play the blues. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I think Martin is trying (and succeeding) in leading the pack by trying new materials in their guitars. However, to me, the Martins made with other-than-wood materials are nowhere near the CA and Rainsong composites. Just my view, but the sound of the CAs and Rainsongs far exceeds anything in Martin's DX line and similar. Of course, we are talking different materials from what I understand.
__________________
NEW SONGS on Reverbnation http://www.reverbnation.com/larrygarrett The Missouripicker's YouTube Channel URL:http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMissouripicker Gibson J100 Walnut, Gibson Hummingbird, Gibson Dove, Gibson J45TV, Gibson AJ RW, Gibson AJ Koa, Gibson Southern Jumbo, Gibson J15, Martin HD28, Alvarez MFA66SHB and many other guitars, banjos, mandolins, dobros, dulcimers, and strays. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
When it comes down to it, martin is a business, so all decisions are economically driven. Micarta is a good way to not only reduce production costs (whether or not the actual $/sqft is lower), but also to consistantly reproduce a guitar with the same quality and sound... So while some would say it's not financially motivated, because it's designed to get a better sound. i'd argue that it is because better sound drives better sales.
__________________
1997 514c + e (b-band ast) 1970 Guild D35 + fishman rare earth single coil Carvin DC200 > (a bunch of effects) > epiphone valve jr head > homemade 2x10 cab Japanese Ephiphone Thunderbird > yorkville xm50 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
If it's not, the feeling must be it soon will be or, as has been said, that a scarcity of wood product will make it so. As a rule, replacing a traditional material with a synthetic in something like a guitar is not simply done because one can. It either has to be economically driven or proven to be demonstrably better before the buying public will accept it.
__________________
. _________________________________ "A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy." --Samuel Adams |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The carbon materials used by CA and Rainsong use are much more expensive, and it shows in the prices for those guitars.
__________________
Chris We all do better when we all do better. |