The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-24-2019, 09:32 AM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They're great on mahogany guitars, especially mahogany tops. I prefer Pearse Pure Nickels on spruce tops, but not by much. I have retros on my wood-bodied resonator, and they're fine -- maybe a little mellow.

But like I always answer in these string threads -- for eight bucks, it's cheap and easy to decide for yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-24-2019, 09:48 AM
Shades of Blue Shades of Blue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
Generally thinner, less thick than bronze wound or pb. They cut into the guitar wood and bracing like a sharp probe and extract what’s ever to be found there.

Still have them on my OM-21 (ethereal), on my first new 000-15m it was metallic ear bleed.
Are you saying that the strings physically damaged your guitar? I don't know what you mean here...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-24-2019, 09:52 AM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaden View Post
They cut into the guitar wood and bracing like a sharp probe and extract what’s ever to be found there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of Blue View Post
Are you saying that the strings physically damaged your guitar? I don't know what you mean here...
metaphor (noun): a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-24-2019, 10:44 AM
LAGinz LAGinz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 58
Default

They sound great on my J-15 (walnut back and sides; Sitka top). Have had them on for 6 weeks, and still going strong!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:01 AM
hat hat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,372
Default

Like most of the others, I like them on Mahogany. they give that more fundemental, old timey tone. the D'adarrio Nickel Bronze are nice too, but brighter initially and cost twice as much. I have not tried them on Rosewood, and probably won't.
__________________
______________
---Tom H ---
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:09 AM
beatcomber beatcomber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lexington, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,448
Default

Listen to Bob Dylan's early pre-electric albums... that is the sound of monel strings.

I tried a set on my '64 Gibson F25 Folksinger and immediately loved their woody thump and delicate treble. That first set lasted maybe 5 months, so that's a pretty good run.

I next went back to PB (D'Addario's) and, while I liked their zing, I found that they sounded thinner than I liked vs. the monels. I went back to the Retros, and have no plans to use any other strings on that guitar.
__________________
1955 Gibson ES-125
1956 Fender Champ lap steel
1964 Guild Starfire III
1984 Rickenbacker 330
1990s Mosrite (Kurokumo) Ventures
2002/2005 Fender Japan '60s Tele [TL-62-66US]
2008 Hallmark 60 Custom
2018 Martin Custom Shop 00-18 slot-head

1963 Fender Bandmaster (blonde blackface)
1965 Ampeg Gemini I
2020 Mojotone tweed Champ kit build
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:16 AM
Shades of Blue Shades of Blue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Voltaire View Post
metaphor (noun): a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
I realized it was a metaphor, but I was wondering if it was more a hyperbole describing some sort of damage that they did to the guitar.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:16 AM
kayakman kayakman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 756
Default

Retro`s work very nice on my 38 L5, also the D Addario NB`s are also nice sounding strings..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:44 AM
Jaden Jaden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Voltaire View Post
metaphor (noun): a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
Thanks. I always follow your posts with interest.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:48 AM
steviebee74 steviebee74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 8
Default

I use them on my acoustic archtop and they are perfect for that & seem to last for months. I use 13 gauge if it’s any interest.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-24-2019, 11:54 AM
archerscreek archerscreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,236
Default

I immediately became a fan when I put a set of Retros on my D-18GE. The Retros softened the sharpness I otherwise heard with PB on that guitar, bringing it a bit closer to my HD-28 custom. Longevity has at least matched that of my best PB uncoated strings. I lost no volume. Such a fan that I bought a dozen sets when strings and beyond had a sitewide 15% off sale.

Last edited by archerscreek; 04-24-2019 at 11:57 AM. Reason: Typing issues on phone.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-24-2019, 12:57 PM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beatcomber View Post
Listen to Bob Dylan's early pre-electric albums... that is the sound of monel strings.

I tried a set on my '64 Gibson F25 Folksinger and immediately loved their woody thump and delicate treble. That first set lasted maybe 5 months, so that's a pretty good run.

I next went back to PB (D'Addario's) and, while I liked their zing, I found that they sounded thinner than I liked vs. the monels. I went back to the Retros, and have no plans to use any other strings on that guitar.
Yeah, but a recorded guitar in a song doesn't sound like that in person after all the EQ and compression used. It's not really a fair representation of the tone.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-25-2019, 04:01 AM
JC. JC. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 442
Default

I find Retros typically last about 10 - 15 minutes. That's usually how long I can bear them before I rip them off.

However, I've just put them on a Mahogany/Spruce OM.....and they're not awful...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-25-2019, 04:52 AM
Jaden Jaden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC. View Post
I find Retros typically last about 10 - 15 minutes. That's usually how long I can bear them before I rip them off.

However, I've just put them on a Mahogany/Spruce OM.....and they're not awful...
I found the same when trying Retros on my guitars for the first time - unbearable at the start, and I had high expectations for them on my first 000-15m which I have since let go - it was a very ‘tight’ guitar from new and it was not a good match (very hard/ strict severe metallic ring to them).

On a whim I put them on my spruce-rosewood OM-21 and they have remained, revealing a very sweet voice to that instrument and quite unexpected.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-25-2019, 06:21 AM
tnez13 tnez13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 220
Default

I'm beginning to have a love/dislike relationship with the Martin Retros. In my experience, the Retros offer a consistent sound for a longer time than 80/20 or PB's. I have a sitka/pau ferro guitar and the sound is fairly good. That's where the dislike starts to come in.

I was thinking my guitar didn't have the sizzle or the dazzle of the sound I was hearing from the artists I listen to and I wasn't sure why. A couple months ago, I had an extra set of PB Martin Mediums that needed to be used so I put those on when I replaced the Retros. And that's when the sizzle returned to my guitar. I realized that I like the zing from the regular PB strings. The lifespan of the PB's was shorter and I'm now trying out a set of heavy Straight Up strings to check their sound, life, and playability.

So, I have a conundrum. I like the life of the Retros and am okay with the sound. I really like the sound of the PB's but wish they sounded good for longer than a month. (I'm purely a hobby player so I don't put a lot of hours on strings very quickly.) Martin Mediums run about $7, last a month for a yearly budget of $84. Retros are $9, last about three months for a yearly budget of $36. The Straight Up strings cost $12 including shipping. I'm guessing a life of around two months for a yearly cost of $72. If they can go three months, the yearly cost is $48. Budget-wise, the Retros will win out but I think I'm going to be spending a little more because the PB is better in my ears.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=