The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-27-2008, 04:19 PM
gtr4me gtr4me is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock Poling View Post

I know I am bucking the crowd here.... .
I think you are bucking less of a crowd than you think. I am with you; you get what you get when it is done and the number of contradictions to conventional wisdom make conventional wisdom highly suspect. I really like your "systems" comprised of architecture, geometry, wood, string, bone, glue... comment and would add what I think is the most important part of the system - the maker.

I owned a 00 adi/AB which was very even tonally but could never be described as having a strong or full bass, and I had a Goodall Parlor of very similar dimensions made of maple and cedar and the bass on that guitar was the most beautifully resonant and full as any guitar of any size I ever owned.

The standard descriptions as to how certain woods sound will forever continue, as will the significant number of contradictions to the standard descriptions.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-27-2008, 06:26 PM
690MBCOMMANDO 690MBCOMMANDO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,620
Default

Hey Reags - Not sure if this was mentioned, but I would recommend doing a separate list for topwoods and those for back and sides. The reason I mention this is that same wood may fall on different parts of the scale of darkness relative to the peer set. For example I generally think of Mahogany as a "brighter" b/s wood, while as a top wood I would place it closer to the middle of the pack since it would be compared to the spruce family. Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-27-2008, 08:45 PM
reags's Avatar
reags reags is offline
Winning!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Straya (Syd)
Posts: 4,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 690MBCOMMANDO View Post
Hey Reags - Not sure if this was mentioned, but I would recommend doing a separate list for topwoods and those for back and sides. The reason I mention this is that same wood may fall on different parts of the scale of darkness relative to the peer set. For example I generally think of Mahogany as a "brighter" b/s wood, while as a top wood I would place it closer to the middle of the pack since it would be compared to the spruce family. Just a thought.
For sure, I'm actually considering that now more so thanks for the push over the edge, I think I'll take you up on that

It is indeed quite a challenge to classify woods and order them tonally as its so subjective according to each user. I guess that in itself is a fun part of guitar shopping, finding the tone that suits the individual.
__________________
2oo6 R Taylor Style 1 Koa/Adi
2o1o Taylor GS Mini
2o13 Taylor Custom GS 12-String

reagsbydesign (ree-g'ss-b'i-d'sine) n.1. expect the unexpected.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=