The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-28-2013, 07:26 PM
LightningBolt LightningBolt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 19
Default Gibson Reissues the J50! As a J35?

Only they're calling it a J35 now. It's basically Emmylou Harris's new model. Guess in her old age she's getting sick of playing that huge super jumbo guitar.

The shop nearby got two in, today. They're already both gone. Whoa!

Here's mine, next to my '62 J45

Last edited by LightningBolt; 02-28-2013 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2013, 08:40 PM
davenumber2 davenumber2 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,266
Default Gibson Reissues the J50!

The J-50 and J-35 are 2 different guitars. The Emmylou Harris sig model, which already exists, is the L-200 which is a smaller version of the J200. But yes, the J-35 is now a standard production model. What do you think of it?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2013, 08:40 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,164
Default

Bolt, the J-35 designation is one that Gibson has used in the past for a natural finish round-shouldered dreadnought. When Doc Watson first started gigging he used one, though I couldn't tell you what year his was. I presume his was 1950's-vintage, but perhaps someone who has more in-depth knowledge can let us know.


whm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2013, 08:46 PM
michaeljohnr michaeljohnr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,255
Default

How do these sound?

I've been waiting for them to come out and for some reviews before I pull the trigger.

At $1599 - $1699, they appear to be a great deal!
__________________
Gibson J-45
Martin D18
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2013, 08:55 PM
dirkronk dirkronk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 3 miles due north of the Alamo
Posts: 3,134
Default

OK, quick search for specs indicates solid spruce top with mahogany back and sides...so does that mean laminate in this case?

Also, what's the nut width?

Anyone?

Nice looking guitar.

Dirk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2013, 09:00 PM
davenumber2 davenumber2 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,266
Default Gibson Reissues the J50!

I can't imagine Gibson doing laminate b/s on this but the specs I have seen do say solid spruce top and mahogany b/s.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2013, 09:08 PM
michaeljohnr michaeljohnr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,255
Default

I would guess 1.75" nut width and I doubt Gibson would do laminate back and sides although I have not heard for sure what they are.

I'd bet solid though.
__________________
Gibson J-45
Martin D18
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2013, 09:44 PM
JRB JRB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Hampton View Post
Bolt, the J-35 designation is one that Gibson has used in the past for a natural finish round-shouldered dreadnought. When Doc Watson first started gigging he used one, though I couldn't tell you what year his was. I presume his was 1950's-vintage, but perhaps someone who has more in-depth knowledge can let us know.


whm
I believe J-50 is the designation for the natural-top round-shoulder. The J-35 was the precursor to the J, AJ, SJ, etc. The best guitar I've ever played was a late-30's J-35.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2013, 10:10 PM
J185-4Me J185-4Me is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningBolt View Post
Only they're calling it a J35 now. It's basically Emmylou Harris's new model. Guess in her old age she's getting sick of playing that huge super jumbo guitar.

The shop nearby got two in, today. They're already both gone. Whoa!

Here's mine, next to my '62 J45
Yes, we saw that one (or one just like it) a few weeks ago at the Fretboard Journal/Gibson-sponsored John Thomas' "Kalamazoo Gals" book-unveiling, in Seattle.

The good folks at Gibson took along their "J-35/45", as pictured here. Nice enough guitar, plays and sounds fine, and I'm sure it'll be a winner, but it just seems like Gibson couldn't copy their way out of a wet paper bag when it comes to getting the details right!

Their new "J-35" guitar notably sports a banner and script logo as was used on many of the war-era guitars.

For comparison, an original:


Hopefully they'll correct that little detail on *most* of the production guitars!

Fred
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2013, 10:10 PM
zombywoof zombywoof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,356
Default

The J-35 was Gibson's answer to the Martin dread. While I am not positive about the chronology, they came with two or three tone bars, sometimes scalloped, sometimes not. The originals are the lightest built guitars I have ever run across. The earliest ones were sunburst - the natural top versions were introduced around 1939. There are even some with an opaque yellow finish. I believe the last ones were made in 1942 - the same year Gibson started shipping the J-45 and J-50.

I would also agree that the original J-35s are the best Gibsons I have ever played.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard

Last edited by zombywoof; 02-28-2013 at 10:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-01-2013, 12:46 AM
LightningBolt LightningBolt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davenumber2 View Post
The J-50 and J-35 are 2 different guitars. The Emmylou Harris sig model, which already exists, is the L-200 which is a smaller version of the J200. But yes, the J-35 is now a standard production model. What do you think of it?
Well aware of the difference between a real j35 and a real j50, and I'm a little confused as to why they opted to "misname" the new one. As for Emmylou, it won't be a signature model at any point per se (as the J200-ish one already is) but this was basically a guitar they built for her and then decided to make into a production model. Or so I was told at the store.

All that said, it's a hell of a guitar. I did a rehearsal tonight with it and it sounded and felt great. Can't wait to see how it goes this weekend. Not sure about the pickup - it's an LR Baggs and those are just fine I suppose but with a J35/J45 I really prefer the Fishman sound hole pickup. A buddy has a real J35 and I've always been super jealous. Kind of like a younger brother version of my J45. Sounds fantastic. I was a little bummed when I found out that this was really a J50 because I'd have loved a smaller guitar, but I played it and decided pretty quickly that it was among the best of the slope shoulder dreads I've played. And I've played a lot of them... $1500 well spent. This guitar is going to see a lot of use. At least 125 gigs a year probably.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:56 AM
michaeljohnr michaeljohnr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,255
Default

This might help:

__________________
Gibson J-45
Martin D18
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-01-2013, 07:41 AM
Murphy Slaw Murphy Slaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 2,974
Default

The price is nice...
__________________
The Murph Channel

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkomGsMJXH9qn-xLKCv4WOg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-01-2013, 08:09 AM
dirkronk dirkronk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 3 miles due north of the Alamo
Posts: 3,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljohnr View Post
This might help:

Thanks for posting this...clears up the "solid or lam" question. All solid, as one would expect from Gibson. Now to find out about nut width. Most modern Gibsons I've tried have been 1-11/16" or 1-23/32"--just shy of the 1-3/4" that's become my minimum requirement now that age has broadened/rounded my fingertips. Gibson has always run just a little narrow for me...when I was a teenager in the '60s, the Gibson models that got me pumped were closer to 1-5/8".

Dirk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-01-2013, 08:09 AM
zombywoof zombywoof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J185-4Me View Post
Their new "J-35" guitar notably sports a banner and script logo as was used on many of the war-era guitars.
I do not think though that even the last J-35s made in 1942 had the Banner logo.










as stopped sometime before spring 1942.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=