#16
|
|||
|
|||
I apologize it took so long to answer you...No
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
You are very patient.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The main reason for this is to concentrate the weight towards the fingertip where it contributes to single-note tone and sustain played with the tip of the slide. It also balances the slide and fits the shape of the finger better than a straight slide, making it very comfortable to wear. Each to his own, though. Certainly, Martin Simpson plays a lot of slide with his 196 gram tungsten carbide Wolfram Signature Slide, without any problems with comfort or endurance. Cheers, David
__________________
Wolfram Perfecting the interface between you and your guitar.
wolframslides.com Endorsed by Martin Simpson and Tony McManus. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The bottleneck that I cut from a champagne bottle can be seen & heard here if anyone is interested. It weighs 125 grams, by the way.
https://youtu.be/QRAW1Yx71uc?t=1241 In theory the link should FF to where I'm playing my Gibson L-5. The bottleneck has a concave outside, and so it fits the 12" radius typically found on Gibson instruments. You'll notice that I also fret quite a bit, but the action is not low. Because the bottleneck touches all the strings with no pressure, it's easy to keep the full-chord groups in closer intonation. With a straight sided slide, a tighter radiused string bed can be problematic when having to depress the inner strings in order to touch the outer strings at the same time. Regards, Howard Emerson |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I own one. I bought a large, and it's OK on my pinky, but a little cumbersome and not snug. It's perfect on my ring finger, and has led me to experiment with playing with the slide on that finger. I found this thread because I'm looking for a medium, because this is the best slide I've ever played. The feel is fantastic, and the tone is awesome.
|