#1
|
||||
|
||||
Maple vs MahogonyB/S diff.
I was wondering if someone could describe the tonal difference between a maple B/S and a mahogony B/S. Assuming both have the same tops (sitka)
thanks
__________________
Cloud by Day, Fire by Night 2004 Martin OM28V |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
For What It's worth . . . .
My personal experience has been that maple is a little more bright and punchy than mahogany. The mahogany guitars I've played have a warmer tone to them and great sounding bass, accentuated even more with a cedar top. I have a 310 with maple that projects really well, with a nice tight mid range tone. The 510 I've played had a better (subjective term) overall tone. If you think of tone in the terms of art, mahogany has a watercolor effect (not muddy, but a nice blending effect) where maple has the tendency to stay within the lines. If I were to get a mahogany guitar I would prefer a cedar or mahogany top to accentuate the richness. I really like the sound of the 514 (cedar top), and was completely blown away by a Larrivee LV-05MT (Mahogany top) that had volume and richness.
Just my $0.02.
__________________
Blessings, george p. atkins 2002 Taylor 310ce-ltd (maple) 2004 Taylor 314 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with George and I'd like to add that Maple makes the sound of each note decay faster than Mahogany does. As a result, the sound of is so bright and clear. But I can't go wrong with Mahogany. It produces a more balance tone over 6 strings. And it is so warm with Cedar.
__________________
Pollajak JKSM pieces of you 912C morning song 612C COTTEN little sister XXMC i'm sensitive |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. But, I must also say, the more my 614 gets played, the mellower and sweeter the sound . . .
__________________
355 414 614ce 714ce 814c (Florentine cutaway, tobacco sunburst) Big Baby Larrivée L-05 Gibson J-55 Gibson S.J. Guild D-55 Seagull Grand Artist (Rosewood Parlor) Gold Tone PBR (maple deluxe resonator) Regal RC-51 (tri-cone) Fender F-48 (metal body resonator) Cort Earth 900 A&L AMI Ariana Classical Kent archtop Silvertone archtop Harmony archtop Les Paul Custom Fender Strat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Concerning Small Bodied Fingerstyle guitars:
Maple, because of its damping qualities, will give more single note definition to your sound....... some would describe Maple's tone as "midrange punch". Mahogany's bright and balanced sound will offer less individual note projection, so chords will be perceived audibly to Ring as a cohesive UNIT much sweeter then Maple if the instruments are identical......(as a general rule). i look for Maple when i want note definition, i look for Mahogany when i want evenly defined chordal *chime*, longer sustain, and a increased perception of Natural reverb in the sound. I look for Rosewood/A Dreads when i want to be heard in a bluegrass pickup band. MT Last edited by Mo-Taylors; 07-08-2003 at 04:21 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you want an "almost mahogany(not mahogany)" try sapele, it sounds amazing, IMHO really close to maple in brightness, but with more depth, if Taylor made a 314 gloss finish and with some nice inlays it would be the end of my search forever!, well sort of...
Good luck in your search See ya! Mauricio |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Switching back and forth between my spruce/maple Gibby J-100Xtra and my Martin OM-15 Mahog. b/s/t is a lot of fun. My LKSM6 adding a spruce/mahog to the stable. Agree with all the tone descriptions above by the way.
__________________
Tom www.tomyoungguitar.com www.myspace.com/tomyoungguitar www.youtube.com/TomYoungGuitar |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Maple over mahogany...hmmm...
Comparing a 2001 614ce to a 1997 Taylor 412ce. Granted, the body sizes are different. They're both balanced. Wonderfully smooth players. But here's the reason why I prefer maple. The sound decays sooner, so as a strummer, maple will always be better in my opinion because it's a straight sound.
__________________
~I think that it's okay to buy guitars that aren't Taylors. After all, monogamy is only a wood used in the 500 series.~ No Taylors yet... Martin 000C-16GTE Premium |