The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-07-2003, 04:33 AM
seekingsq seekingsq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
Post 700 vs 900 What's diff beside wood, ornament and $$$?

I am new to this forum with only a 512 to my name. Now under GAS attack for another axe. I am not living in US so I do not have the luxury to choose with my ears. I have to rely on catalogs, reviews, feedbacks, opinions and whatever information I can get. So having to mail order, what I get is what I read.

I have yet to decide on any particular series but quite incline for 14 model. Price gaps between different series are obvious. However, comparison of prices between certain series is meaningless like comparing apple to orange because of the different types of tonewood used. But 700 and 900 series stand out as using the same top (Engelmann) and back/sides (EI rosewood) albeit different grade and different ornaments. The price difference between 700 vs 900 is US$1,500 or 46% based on MSRP. This is quite a sum to pay just for the better wood and abalone shell inlay.

Simply stated, the tone of a guitar is determined by the design, tonewood and craftmanship. Without the chance to hear the end product (tone) before I order, my selection is based on the writeup on the 3 contributing factors.

The Taylor catalogue helps a little. Designs and sizes are similar across series. It provides some information on the grade of tonewood used plus pictures showing the various cosmetic inlays. But it lack information on craftmanship. By craftmanship, I mean input from luthier-grade worker. Surely I would not expect voicing done for 300 series, but what about the 900 series? It is in the price range of hand made custom guitar. On the presentation series, it mentions that Mr Bob Taylor "personally chaperones each Presentation Series guitar through production." How this is interpreted in term of input from the master is anyone's guess.

Can anyone who has toured the Taylor factory or has insider knowledge care to enlighten me?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2003, 05:12 AM
Splatt Splatt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 667
Default

Voicing is only different for the dread and jumbo stylee models in the 5x series and up. I think it was Bob who said there is 90% of a 9x guitar in a 3x guitar. Basically... the grade of wood will be top notch (has nothing to do with the sound though) and appointments are much better. If you just want something that sounds great and not bothered about the appointments then i'd suggest looking for a 4x limited (rosewood) and save yourself a couple of thousand $
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2003, 07:46 AM
pollajak's Avatar
pollajak pollajak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
Posts: 2,126
Smile

Hi,

I had this question when I was initially interested by Taylor guitars. I inspected many guitars, talked to sellers, read review, and compared prices. I found that all upper-level Taylor guitars are consistent in craftsmanship quality. They were build by same people and equipment. Sizes, types and grades of woods, and cosmatics determine the prices.

Obviously, 900 series uses better grade of woods than 700 series does (only 714ce uses Cedar top instead Engleman Spruce). And cosmatics look more precious and elegant. Sound and Taste are main factors. I prefer Koa rosette and rosewood binding of 700 series to fretboard inlay and celluloid binding of current 900 series.
__________________
Pollajak
JKSM pieces of you
912C morning song
612C COTTEN little sister
XXMC i'm sensitive

Last edited by pollajak; 07-08-2003 at 12:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2003, 08:44 AM
TimmyPack TimmyPack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 804
Default

They go from fancy ( 700 ) to real fancy ( 800 ), to ultra fancy ( 900 ). It just depends on how pretty you want the guitar. I recently bought a 414R-ce. Its a 400 series guitar, with sitka top, and rosewood b/s. Its everything a 714ce is, except the gold tuners I think, but that can be easily fixed for around $50.

if you are going after sound and decide on a 700 series, its worth it for yourself to get an upgraded top. Even if you stay with the same top wood, a nicer piece of wood, will effect the sound. The top is where you get most of your sound from. The grade of the back and sides, like already stated, dont really affect the sound that much, but the top wood will.

Hope this helps
TP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2003, 08:55 AM
Stuart Stuart is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sussex County, New Jersey
Posts: 1,951
Default

You got it . . . better grade of wood and more eye candy. For this reason, many have found the 700 series to represent excellent value. Will you be able to hear the difference from the better grade wood? I can't. Does it matter to you if the 900 series looks a lot prettier? (it sure does look sweet) Are you flush enough to say "Oh what the heck, it's only money, I'll get the 900"?

If you answered no to more than one of these questions, get the 700 and you'll love it.
__________________
If it ain't never been in a pawn shop, it can't play the blues.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2003, 02:52 PM
GSnyde GSnyde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,393
Default

The difference between 914 and 714 is 200. [smileyface]

I agree with those who say it is basically all cosmetic. The tone of a 914 and a 714 should be the same (leaving aside variations between any two guitars made of the same woods with the same construction).
__________________
GSnyde

Guitars improve with age. The older I get, the more I like them.
----------------
I gots me ....
some Martins
some Santa Cruzes
some Goodalls
some T*****s
Some other stuff
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2003, 04:03 PM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 27,087
Default

Can I assure you that each worker will approach a 300 and a presentation exactly the same? No. But, from the 300 series up, the necks and parts are cut by machine. They are assembled by hand and they all use the same workers, jigs, and glue. Thus, the craftsmanship is roughly the same.

It really comes down to the quality of the tonewoods, both visually and acoustically, and the quality and quantity of the ornamentation. Oh yes, they also grade the neck joints to put the visually prettier ones on the higher series'.

I would love a 900 (old-style, Cindy inlay, fretboard extension). I bought a 700, and it's a great guitar, too.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-07-2003, 04:40 PM
larrymac larrymac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wichita, Kansas area
Posts: 355
Default

My $0.02........go for the 700 series. I own 500, 600, 700, 800, K and W based models. My next Taylor will be a custom Z-14 or Z-15 order based on a 900 series. Other than cosmetic appointments, and higher grade wood selection, the sound on the 700 series is the best bargain and price-point in my experience. Given your geographical location, and your questions, the 700 might be the best complimentary choice to go with your 500 series.
__________________
LarryMac

615, 555, K22, 714ce-LTD (cocobolo), W12c, 810-LTD (cocobolo), 814ce-L1 (brazilian), Breedlove Ed Gerhard, Martin SPD16-TR LTD, Fender Robert Cray Strat, Fender Std Telecaster, Epiphone Riviera, Washburn EA-26, George Gruhn Barrington GC, Beretta, Glock, Ruger, Desert Eagle, and Nikki (following in Kodi's paw prints)

Someday, you'll find Your Taylor
Psalm 33:3
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-07-2003, 04:54 PM
Jeff M Jeff M is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not where I thought I was going, but probably where I need to be.
Posts: 18,601
Default

While there have been several replies mentioning the higher grade of woods used in the 800/900 series guitars, and suggestions to upgrade the top wood if going with a custom order, it should be noted that Taylor (like other large manufacturers) grades their woods on cosmetics, not tone. There is no guarantee that an upgraded top will sound better than a standard top. It will look more "perfect", but tone is not a factor in the upgrade.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2003, 05:48 PM
Jim Jim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,619
Default

There is more to grading wood than cosmetics and cosmetics do play a role in how wood will last over time and sound.

If you want a bargain priced rosewood guitar, get the new 400 series "Summer Strummer" limited edition. It is the best bang for the buck. If you can afford to pay more, the 700 series is a step up and worth the money. If you can afford to pay more, then you really should go for the 800 because it is a worthwhile step up from the 700. And if you can afford a 900, especially if you can find one made in 2000 or before when they had breath-taking inlays and that someone out of their mind is willing to part with, you should go for that.

There is not a huge difference in tone, but the more I play high end Taylors, the more I appreciate the small difference. I guess it is kind of like wine. It is all just fermented grape juice and most people can't tell the difference between one cabernet and another, but once you get used to the good stuff you start noticing why it costs more and you become more willing to pay the higher prices for it.
__________________
Member #12

Acoustics:
1995 Taylor 510
1997 Taylor Custom Shop 14 size
1998 Taylor K-65 12 string
1998 Larrivee C-10E with Mucha Lady IR/Sitka

Electrics:
1999 PRS Custom 22 Artist Package - Whale Blue/Ebony
1995 Fender Custom Shop 1960 Strat - Dakota/Maple
1997 Fender California Series Fat Strat - CAR/Maple
1968 Teisco e-110 Sunburst/Maple
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-07-2003, 06:32 PM
Jeff M Jeff M is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not where I thought I was going, but probably where I need to be.
Posts: 18,601
Default

Jim, it is my understanding that Taylor uses cosmetics when grading it's woods, not tone. Most builders grade this way. Small/solo builders generally also go to great lengths to tap tone or otherwise get an impression of how the wood will sound, and make adjustments to the bracing paterns and top thinning on a guitar by guitar basis. Large manufacturers are unable to do this and turn out the number of instruments that they do.

The subject of cosmetics re; tone is an intersting one. I have had this discussion with several luthiers, and the general consensus is that there is very little correlation between perfect, tight grained wood and killer tone. Michael Milliard at Froggy Bottom Guitars believes that, re: adirondac, the better sounding pieces are the LESS visually perfect ones. James Goodall believes, in the case of Koa, that the more visually stunning pieces (more "flamed") actually tend to dampen the sound more. I have heard others say the same about figured mahogany and maple. Frank Ford addresses the issue at his site, believing (in general) that wider grained top woods tend to slightly accentuate bass response, while tighter grained pieces accentuate the higher tones, neither being "better", just different.

http://www.frets.com/FRETSPages/Musi...onewoods1.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-07-2003, 06:37 PM
gjatkins gjatkins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 690
Default wow

I'd say go for the 414 summer limited with rosewood and be done with it

When will we have a chance like this again?
__________________
Blessings,

george p. atkins

2002 Taylor 310ce-ltd (maple)

2004 Taylor 314
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-08-2003, 04:53 AM
seekingsq seekingsq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
Default 7xx vs 9xx

Many thanks to Splatt, Pollajak, TimmyPack, Stuart, GSnyde, Bob Womack, LarryMac, Jeff M, Jim and gjatkins for taking your time to respond.

Previously, I imagine that Taylor factory being such a big manufacturing facility churning out over 100 guitars per day would have separate production lines for specific series. And the higher skilled worker would logically be assigned to the higher number series line.

If I read all your replies correctly, I gather that in fact Taylor factory has one common production line where all series and models are worked on (assembled by hand) by the same set of workers using the same jigs and tools. The consensus is that there is no different in production process between 3xx series upward to 9xx series. That the extra price to pay is for better wood and ornamental inlays. That I will be better off to settle for 7xx (comparing between 7xx vx 9xx) if I am going for the sound only and not interested in cosmetics. Or that I should opt for top wood upgrade to 9xx standard if I believe better wood = better tone.

This would lead me to another question: Does Taylor accept such custom order i.e. for 1 piece of 7xx made with top wood upgraded to 9xx grade? How much is estimated upcharge?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-08-2003, 05:12 AM
Doulos Doulos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: malaysia
Posts: 750
Default

if i were u i will go for the highest series
have not heard the sound of a 7 or 9
so can't really say anything but my mindset now is for the HIGHest haha
hehe juz my 2 cents
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-08-2003, 07:27 AM
pollajak's Avatar
pollajak pollajak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
Posts: 2,126
Smile

You can order 900 top for a 700. But it will drive the cost up. Taylor provides a lot of upgrading/downgrading options. It incates the costs to change type and grade of woods. However, the information I have is obsolete (3 years old). You can ask the dealer or directly call Taylor to ask them the additional cost to upgrade the top.

I would highly recommend you to stick with the standard 700 top. Difference of sound will not be much immense because of back/side remains.
__________________
Pollajak
JKSM pieces of you
912C morning song
612C COTTEN little sister
XXMC i'm sensitive

Last edited by pollajak; 07-08-2003 at 12:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=