#1
|
|||
|
|||
Switching top woods on standard models
I was wondering if this was possible without turning it into a BTO. For example, if I wanted to buy a standard GS5 or 510ce, and I would rather have a Sitka top, than an Engelman or Cedar, would Taylor do that with out it being considered a BTO?
I've been thinking about a Mahogany Taylor for my next purchase, but prefer Sitka as a top when paired with Mahogany. Thanks for any info.
__________________
Taylor- DN8, GS Mini, XXX- KE Gibson - Gospel Reissue Takamine- GB7C |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I spoke with Taylor about that and they told me they would do that under the modify a model program. I wanted a different binding but they said they would not do that but I could go with a different top. Go figure
__________________
2010 Taylor Custom GAK 2007 Taylor 214e 2000 Martin D1-R 1967 Harmony Classical |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, that does that seem strange that they would do that on the top wood and not the binding, unless you were going from plastic to wood.
I may contact Jim pretty soon then. a Sitka topped GS5, sounds like it could be a great guitar.
__________________
Taylor- DN8, GS Mini, XXX- KE Gibson - Gospel Reissue Takamine- GB7C |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
it sure does
i'm wondering if they could do an adirondack top with adi CV bracing on the "modify a model" program (or perhaps it's just sitka, engelmann or cedar on the 500 series/up, with Standard II bracing on 5/6/700s) - if you're looking at a non-cutaway model, it might be more economical & it would give you more options (many low $ or no-cost) to go the BTO route. a sitka (or adi) top 510ce or 516ce would be pretty cool (imho)... especially with a honeyburst top & edgeburst finish back, sides & neck
__________________
it's not about what you play... it's all about why you play |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Switching tops
Cool thread, I plan on getting a 714c with an engleman top. I was wondering the same thing. Basically I want a 914c without the fancy stuff. I know the grade of the wood is different but how much difference could there be in terms of sound. I dont think its that much. I know you can get a 900 series top on a 714c which would be sweet. I think being able to modify models to your taste is a very cool thing. Like I said I want a 914c in terms of tone, but I dont like bling on my guitars. Anyone agree that a 714c with an engleman top is the way to go? Would a 714c with a 900 series top be even better in terms of tone? Appreciate any advice.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
When you start changing a standard model too much it falls under the BTO option so iut makes sense they would limit the changes one can make to a standard model.
__________________
Liam F. 👽🖖🏼👑 🎶 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1998 Taylor 410 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
714c engleman
Thanks for the info. I wasnt sure if the difference in grade was tonal or just asthetic. I thought the 914c had a tone that was unique to that guitar. I guess it was just the engleman that gave it that unique sound. I'm sure the sitka sounds excellent too and the change is probably due to the shortage of engleman, I heard bob taylor say somewhere that good engleman was getting hard to find. As far as upgrading a 714c to engleman, that should be no prob then. The rosewood on the 714c shouldnt sound any different than the rosewood on the 914c in theory? Anyone know the best or least expensive way of doing this? Should I have sam ash or guitar center order me one, or go right through taylor ( I assume the more expensive way)? I was thinking around 3,000 for this guitar. Thanks for any imput.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
1998 Taylor 410 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
714c engleman
Thats a good point about the tightness of grain. You know thats the difference right there. Gives the 914 that little extra magic.
|