The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:35 PM
MichaelMurray MichaelMurray is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 20
Default

I would agree with a few of the other posters that if you are looking for a good sounding guitar when amplified Taks are pretty good value for the money but if you look for a good sounding acoustic guitar they are not good value for the money. In other words the guitar's electronics are of a higher quality than the guitar itself. I used to own one and was amazed by how good it sounded plugged in compared to acoustic but finally I just got fed up with the poor acoustic sound and sold it. None of the Taks I have tried since then have changed my opinion that they are generally poor to mediocre guitars that have good electronics.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-15-2006, 01:52 PM
vbluguitar vbluguitar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cleveland, Oh
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sam.I.am
a non-solid wood guitar is not real? wow. learn something new every day. (shrugs)
As far as acoustic guitars go, no. A laminated guitar is basically a boat oar. It is not a real acoustic guitar. I have no facts to back that up, but I wouldn't feel bad taking a Tak canoeing, lets just put it like that.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-15-2006, 02:10 PM
steverok steverok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 536
Default

I used to think mine was decent unplugged, and great plugged in. Since I got my Gibson, the Tak now seems sadly pitiful unplugged, and piercingly brittle when plugged in, in comparison to the jumbo Gibson. However, I still have it, despite these obvious deficiencies, it still has its place as "beater", and it seems to be pretty immune to feedback. It's also comfortable and plays nicely - in other words, it's "service-able".
__________________
Steve-O
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-15-2006, 03:12 PM
donkey kong donkey kong is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: trapped in your old atari
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vbluguitar
As far as acoustic guitars go, no. A laminated guitar is basically a boat oar. It is not a real acoustic guitar. I have no facts to back that up, but I wouldn't feel bad taking a Tak canoeing, lets just put it like that.
how long have you been working at guitar center?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-16-2006, 04:35 PM
egkor egkor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 224
Default

I played a Tak EF341SC for two years.

Sold it, moved on up.

I still like them, and see them on TV quite often.

I prefer the "made in Japan" Taks.
__________________

Taylor- 614ce (2012), 614ce (2008), 315ce (2010)
Martin- DX1 (2009)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-22-2010, 11:29 AM
leehop71 leehop71 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,103
Default Eg260c

This guitar is very comparable in size and specs to my Ibanez AEG10E. The only question I have does it have a good balanced plugged in sound, good bottom, middle, and top. The Ibanez does and I know because of the small body it won't have a good unplugged sound. I never use unplugged as I have a straight acoustic for that. Anyone?
Jack
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-22-2010, 11:45 AM
ewalling ewalling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,772
Default

I had a TC135SC crossover nylon string, which I sold not so long ago. As others have said, it was very good plugged in. However, I think if a guitar also walks and talks like an acoustic, it should deliver a good acoustic sound, which this one didn't, for me. I think I would have been more impressed by it if Takamine had abandoned the attempt to please everyone and made a slimmer bodied model, with nearly all the emphasis on its plugged in qualities.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-22-2010, 12:40 PM
Throwing Stones Throwing Stones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ljguitar View Post
Hi Blaster...
Medium quality guitars with great pickup systems. Don't sound that great in the room, sound awesome through PA systems.

Action can be set to play well, and if you damage one, it can be replaced in a day or two.


I have to respectfully disagree. Unfortunately, taks still get a bad rap unplugged. Keep an open mind
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-22-2010, 12:58 PM
pete12string pete12string is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 694
Default

Import. Go for a US made. Martin, Taylor, etc. Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-22-2010, 01:02 PM
ewalling ewalling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete12string View Post
Import. Go for a US made. Martin, Taylor, etc. Just my opinion.
'Import' has nothing to do with it. There are great guitar makers all over the world ... including the USA!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-22-2010, 01:05 PM
Squeezebox Squeezebox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete12string View Post
Import. Go for a US made. Martin, Taylor, etc. Just my opinion.
????????

JAPANESE MADE Tak EAN40C owner here...sounds GREAT unplugged as well as plugged in.....very fun / easy to play

I've played lots of Martin's and Taylor's that have really underwhelmed me by the way
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-22-2010, 01:09 PM
PorkPieGuy PorkPieGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,132
Default

I'd put my $1K Tak up against a $1K martin or taylor anyday of the week.

EF341SC - It does everything i need it to do for a strummer. Bon Jovi, Toby Keith, and Springsteen seem to like it pretty well too. What a workhorse.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-22-2010, 02:43 PM
Lacks Focus Lacks Focus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,590
Default

I think in general they make great guitars for the money. My first acoustic was a Takamine back in the mid-'70s when they copied Martins down to the script typeface on the headstock. I don't recall the model number, but it was an all-laminate copy of a D-28. While its sound would never pass for a real D-28, it played and sounded better than any all-laminate guitar had any right to. The only reason I ever sold it was to get cash to put toward my M-38. As much as I love my M-38, there are times when I wish I'd kept the Tak, as well as buy the Martin. Probably would have only taken a couple more weeks of saving to do it.
__________________
Craig

1977 Martin M-38
1982 Stelling Staghorn
2013 Larrivée D-40R
2014 Andrew White Eos 1011 (sold)
2016 Pisgah Possum
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-22-2010, 03:00 PM
HD18JBGuy HD18JBGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 690
Default

I like them. I like them a lot (the solid wood versions that is...not the "boat oars" as referred above).
__________________
Martin HD-28V
Martin HD-18JB
Martin 000-JBP
Martin 000-JBS
Martin LX Jimmy Buffett
Martin DM3MD
Martin D-16GT
Martin Sigma DR-41
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-22-2010, 03:08 PM
steamfurnace steamfurnace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,175
Default

My EF381SC sounds great plugged in, and I have gotten compliments on that sound at a couple gigs. That being said, it is a bit quiet unplugged, but the neck shape and low action make it easier to play than some other 12 string acoustics I have tried.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=