The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:12 PM
timo31 timo31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 29
Default Nut width - Eastman e10om vs Martin 00018

Does anyone have both guitars - Eastman e10om vs Martin 00018?

If you are so lucky to have both guitar, can you measure both guitars nut width? According to Eastman's website, e10om has 1-3/4" but some said it's actually narrower than Martin...

Then, how much narrow?

Last edited by Kerbie; 11-16-2017 at 06:12 PM. Reason: Sp... in title
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:44 PM
ManyMartinMan ManyMartinMan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: In The Hills, Off Mulholland
Posts: 4,101
Default

I assume you mean.... nut width - you can change that. You probably just need verification on the Eastman because the Martin is indeed 1.75"

Last edited by ManyMartinMan; 11-16-2017 at 05:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2017, 06:11 PM
ii Cybershot ii ii Cybershot ii is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,218
Default

In my experience Eastman necks are subject to variations and especially the spacing of the nuts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2017, 06:52 PM
timo31 timo31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ii Cybershot ii View Post
In my experience Eastman necks are subject to variations and especially the spacing of the nuts.
how about yours? can you check yours?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2017, 07:30 PM
Sagebrush Tom Sagebrush Tom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Eastern Sierra, NV.
Posts: 638
Default

I have a Eastman E20OM and a 00-18 Martin (new model) and both have 1 3/4" nuts and 2 5/32" at the saddle. The difference is at the nut and the Martin string spacing is about 1/16" wider. I also have a 000-15m which has a 1 11/16" nut. It is closer to the Eastman than the Martin 00. Before i bought the 15 series, i always thought that anything under 1 3/4" was a deal killer. Now i've owned the 15 series for almost two weeks and i found that it's easily adaptable. Now i know we're not talking about the 15 series and the string spacing is the same on both E10 and E20 models, and the new 00 Martin is the same as the new 000. If possible play both guitars and then make your decision. To me the big decision is whether you like sitka top (000) or the Adi top (E10).
Good luck

Tom
__________________
E10 00 Eastman
00-18 Martin
000-15 SM Martin
E20 OM-SB Eastman
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2017, 07:32 PM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,545
Default

I just measured my E 6 OM Limited Edition.
It's 1 3/4" dead on. Hope that helps
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2017, 08:58 PM
5th Element 5th Element is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Area 52
Posts: 477
Default

My '11 E10OM has a 1-3/4" nut, but the string spacing was a little narrow. A new nut brought that to 1-33/64". At the saddle, string spacing is 2-7/32".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2017, 02:16 AM
Guest 1511
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My Eastman E10 OO is 1 3/4 exactly. I saw someone in your other thread saying they were running narrow, but you have three responses now that pretty much prove that maybe isn't correct. There may be exceptions, but I think if you want a 1 3/4 nut, any new Eastman should be exactly that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2017, 06:52 AM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,545
Default

I really think it's a string spacing issue. I'm going to measure the spacing on my E 6 OM Ltd. and my Martin OMC-15e and see what, if any, difference exists. The nuts are both 1 3/4" and I have noticed no difference in the spacing when playing them back to back.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-17-2017, 11:26 AM
AHill AHill is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 554
Default

Nut width on my E10 OM is 1-3/4". String spacing at the nut is 1-1/2". String spacing at the saddle is 2-3/16". Eastman says spacing at the bridge is 2-5/32". The E10 OM is a short scale guitar, if that makes any difference.
__________________
2016 Martin D-28 Marquis
2017 Martin D-18
2016 Taylor 416ce-LTD cedar/walnut
2017 Eastman E10 OM
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-17-2017, 12:47 PM
MHC MHC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,856
Default

I own a Martin 00-21 and Eastman E8-OM. They both claim to have a 1 3/4" nut width.

I measured them both, and indeed they are both 1 3/4"

I also measured the string spacing and they are identical there too.

BUT, I know that Eastman's have in the past varied by a fraction in the string spacing department. It was a QC issue. I'm not sure if they've become more consistently standard lately.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-17-2017, 01:06 PM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MHC View Post
I own a Martin 00-21 and Eastman E8-OM. They both claim to have a 1 3/4" nut width.

I measured them both, and indeed they are both 1 3/4"

I also measured the string spacing and they are identical there too.

BUT, I know that Eastman's have in the past varied by a fraction in the string spacing department. It was a QC issue. I'm not sure if they've become more consistently standard lately.
Same here. String spacing on my Martin OM and my Pono Dread...same as the Eastman. My Eastman is a 2015 as is the Martin.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-17-2017, 03:11 PM
Judson Judson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Apex, NC (outside of Raleigh)
Posts: 4,966
Default

My Eastman OM nut width is slightly less than than advertised 1 3/4 inches.

I own the AC812-OM.

It bothered me at first, but I've gradually been able to adapt.

I'd still prefer that the nut width advertised be the nut width provided.

On my AC508M, it's dead on 1 3/4 inches as spec'ed.
__________________
"Alas for those that never sing, But die with all their music in them!" --- Oliver Wendell Holmes

Hear my original music at: https://www.reverbnation.com/judsonhair

Last edited by Judson; 12-10-2017 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-17-2017, 03:15 PM
Ted @ LA Guitar Sales Ted @ LA Guitar Sales is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 12,231
Default

Both are 1-3/4" on the ones in the store.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-17-2017, 03:29 PM
Guildman Guildman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 803
Default

I never thought I was picky about the string spacing until I got the 00018. Now its noticeable. Doesn't mean I'll go sell anything but sure like the Martin spacing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Tags
eastman e10om, martin 000-18, nut width






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=