#16
|
|||
|
|||
Technically everything's "different". You could say is the D-28 1937 Authentic better or different? Just as the 1937 is better than the D-28, the HD-28 is better than the D-28. Many Martin fans are just unable to admit that the flagship D-28 is not a good guitar compared to its other iterations. I'd say look at what they play, rather than what they say.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
One more point to add... Which other high end maker copies the straight braced D-28 if it is supposedly so good to warrant non-scalloping?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think that is true Bearclaw. While I agree that Martin fans are sometimes "blind" on some stuff, I think the truth is someone might want a certain sound or have a certain sound in their head, that they will only get out of a certain type of guitar. I look for sweeter sounding guitars with less bass. Anyone who prefers a dread, would think the guitars I play and prefer sound like "toys" or "boxy". Meanwhile I think their dreads sound overloaded and muddy.
They didn't make HD verisons of the guitars to be the next "evolution" of a model, they made them to be different so if you wanted a different sound, you can get a different sound.
__________________
Strummin' and fingerpickin' since 2004 2013 Martin Custom OM-18 2012 Martin 0-28vs 2012 Martin LX1 2012 Telecaster Ltd. Edition Ash Body 2003-ish Takamine Jasmine (first guitar I ever played/learned on) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"I used to try to play fast, and it’s fun for a minute, but I always liked saxophone players. They speak on their instrument, and I always wanted to do that on the guitar, to communicate emotionally. When you write, you wouldn’t just throw words into a bowl. There has to be a beginning, middle and end. Same thing with phrasing on the guitar" Jimmie Vaughan |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Objectively, they're different. Subjectively? The HD-28 is a much more responsive guitar with a tone I much prefer. I don't care for the cheap pickguard and some of the other appointments, but I prefer the tone and playability to the D-28.
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I think they're both fine instruments. Just a question of your own taste. Mine has changed a lot over the last couple of years.
__________________
website: https://www.steveyarbrough.net Bourgeois, Collings, Eastman, Gibson, Martin |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If two things is different and you need to choose between them, you will make a personal judgement about which is better. Something is definitely better and something is definitely worse. Not everyone will agree on which one. That's OK. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Saying that Martins with scalloped bracing are "the best" is like saying that turning up the bass and treble and adding reverb is "the best" setting on an electric guitar amp.
__________________
"I used to try to play fast, and it’s fun for a minute, but I always liked saxophone players. They speak on their instrument, and I always wanted to do that on the guitar, to communicate emotionally. When you write, you wouldn’t just throw words into a bowl. There has to be a beginning, middle and end. Same thing with phrasing on the guitar" Jimmie Vaughan |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Better because it's:
Give a hundred people a choice between a free standard D-28 and a free D-28 1937 and I'm guessing most people are going for the latter because of how it feels, sounds, plays and looks. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Of course some people are going to like one or the other better. I don't think that precludes us each giving our own opinion on which is better. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Here's another one - now that the old straight braced D-18 is gone, who's complaining?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
More responsive Louder More complex Deeper. My reasons for preferring straight braced Martins. Balance from high to low - less boom domination. Better at cutting through a mix. Not so complex - a more direct tone with less reverb and overtones. Tone doesn't get muddy or overdriven when pushed with energetic rhythm playing. I've owned many scalloped braced Martins including a D-18A. I enjoyed them while I had them but for me it's the straight braced tone and feel that I crave.
__________________
"I used to try to play fast, and it’s fun for a minute, but I always liked saxophone players. They speak on their instrument, and I always wanted to do that on the guitar, to communicate emotionally. When you write, you wouldn’t just throw words into a bowl. There has to be a beginning, middle and end. Same thing with phrasing on the guitar" Jimmie Vaughan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And note that I used the word "prefer". The OP asked if the HD-28 was better or just different. It's different and I "prefer" the D-28.
__________________
"I used to try to play fast, and it’s fun for a minute, but I always liked saxophone players. They speak on their instrument, and I always wanted to do that on the guitar, to communicate emotionally. When you write, you wouldn’t just throw words into a bowl. There has to be a beginning, middle and end. Same thing with phrasing on the guitar" Jimmie Vaughan |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
It's amazing what a little bit of scalloping to the braces can do to a guitar. If you decide to forward shift those scalloped braces you have an HD28-V (and a v neck).
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
It's not gone - still very easy to buy them on Ebay. If removed from circulation however, I'm sure you'd find lot's of people complaining.
__________________
"I used to try to play fast, and it’s fun for a minute, but I always liked saxophone players. They speak on their instrument, and I always wanted to do that on the guitar, to communicate emotionally. When you write, you wouldn’t just throw words into a bowl. There has to be a beginning, middle and end. Same thing with phrasing on the guitar" Jimmie Vaughan |