The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-12-2017, 03:16 AM
MikeBodd MikeBodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jhb South Africa
Posts: 361
Default Garrison AG300

Hi all. I've seen one of these advertised. I saw that Gibson bought them out. I can't seem to see if it's a solid top etc. I have read that they have a unique bracing system etc. So any of you know a bit more about them? 1 or 2 reviews I could find sat they are very nice guitars.* This woman is wanting equivalent of about $150
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2017, 08:16 AM
Matt McGriff Matt McGriff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Collierville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,997
Default

The Garrison guitars used plastic bracing systems, essentially creating a scaffolding that the solid woods were attached to to build the the body of the guitar. Gibson bought them and destroyed the brand and any future for Garrison's technology. I played one at a store once, but never any real experience with them.
__________________
<°)))<

1998 Very Sweet Wife
2000 Cute Daughter (Grand Concert)
2005 Handsome Son (Dreadnought)
2007 Lovely Daughter (Parlor)
2017 Cute Puppy (Duke the Uke)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2017, 10:07 AM
Earl49 Earl49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 10,989
Default

Garrison guitars had a pre-molded bracing system for the top and back, bridge plate, head block, and the tail block. The skeleton also acted as the kerfing surface and black edge binding. As mentioned above, real wood was attached to the braces. I thought it was a clever way to save labor. Sound and playability were decent and they made several different levels of quality (IIRC the G30, G40, G50 and G60 series) depending on the woods selected, solid vs. laminate, etc.

It is unfortunate that the Garrison company was bought out and shut down just as they were gaining traction in the market about ten years ago. The only ones I ever saw first hand were dreadnoughts - don't know if they ever got into other body shapes. For $150 you probably cannot go wrong assuming it is still playable, good neck angle, and similar issues. They were in many ways pretty comparable to Seagull in quality and value.

Last edited by Earl49; 03-12-2017 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2017, 11:45 AM
MikeBodd MikeBodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jhb South Africa
Posts: 361
Default

Thanks very much. I thought they were pretty good guitars. I'm going to check it out tomorrow. If I take it I'll send it to my techy for a set up. She's said I can have it for $75. She's moved out of town and it's in the case at a friends house.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2017, 12:42 PM
Mark Lew Mark Lew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 190
Default

Hello Mike! I had a Garrison G-40 many years ago. I sold it in order to get my Larrivee. A gentleman named Chris Griffiths started a guitar building company in Newfoundland, and named the guitars after the street that the factory was on (Garrison Street). The bracing system was made of glass fiber, which was intended to be more stable and standardized than typical wood bracing ( at least that was the selling point ) and the back, sides, top and neck were all comprised of solid woods. Mine was sapele and spruce and really sounded great. They also used the Buzz Feitin tuning system in an effort to improve the guitar's intonation. It was a really nice sounding dread, so if you think that you're getting a good price I would recommend going for it! Let us know what the results are...
__________________
2005 Larrivee D-03E Sitka/Mahogany
2014 Santa Cruz OM/PW Sitka/Rosewood
2015 Breedlove Masterclass Concert Engleman/Myrtle
2018 Larrivee Custom OM-10 Rosewood/Alpine Moon Spruce/Torch inlay
2018 Taylor 524ce LTD NAMM Show all-walnut
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2017, 02:06 PM
MikeBodd MikeBodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jhb South Africa
Posts: 361
Default

Thanks Mark. I'll let you know.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2017, 04:38 PM
Dru Edwards Dru Edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 43,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeBodd View Post
Thanks very much. I thought they were pretty good guitars. I'm going to check it out tomorrow. If I take it I'll send it to my techy for a set up. She's said I can have it for $75. She's moved out of town and it's in the case at a friends house.
Hi Mike, as long as it plays and sounds good I'd buy it for $75. Nice piece of Newfoundland history too.

I have an all solid wood model that I bought used a few years back. It's a shame that Gibson shut down the Newfoundland plant .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2017, 05:15 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,311
Default

I guess I have to be the contrarian in this thread. I've played a bunch of Garrisons, both their Made-in-Nova-Scotia guitars and their later Asian import line. While I admire the cleverness and genuinely original thinking that came up with the "scaffolding" construction method, I never found one of the Canadian-made Garrisons that I liked tonewise.

The music store that's nearest to my house, in Eagle River, Alaska carried the Garrisons, and I'd periodically play those that they had on hand. I really wanted to like them, but I was continually disappointed.

One day I picked one up and found that I liked its sound, then looked inside the soundhole to discover that it was one of their Asian-made models. Those guitars were not constructed with the scaffolding, but were built like traditional wooden guitars.

As for Gibson buying, then shutting down Garrison, the guy who owned the company put it up for sale. Gibson thought that they could offer a line of less expensive guitars that were still made in North America, so they started making a product line that they called the Gibson Songmaker guitars.

Most of which were dogs, frankly. I happened to be at the local Gibson dealership the day their first shipment of Songmakers came in - something like 6 or 8 guitars, all with fresh strings, and I got to play all of them. There wasn't a keeper in the bunch, frankly. There wasn't a single one of them that I would have wanted to own.

While there were a few good-sounding ones made, the Gibson Songmaker line was a flop in the marketplace, and almost all of that initial batch of them that came to Anchorage hung on the store walls for years and years without selling.

So if you combine a poorly selling product line with a remote factory location, it's not surprising that eventually the factory got closed. They're in business to make money, not swallow losses every fiscal quarter.

Something I've seen over and over again is that - in online discussion groups like this one - there seems to be some sort of emotional imperative that feeds the need to assign blame to companies when they make necessary business decisions. But if Garrison guitars had been a successful company it probably wouldn't have been offered for sale, or - if it had - the brand name would have continued. Successful companies do get sold, but it's because some outfit with deeper pockets wants to ride that crest of success and take the success level even higher.

Which didn't happen with Garrison. And if the Gibson Songmaker product line had been successful, it would still be in production today.

But it isn't.

So instead of blaming Gibson for shutting down Garrison guitars, the question we should be asking ourselves is:

"Why did the guy who started the company want to sell it off in the first place?"

Food for thought.


Wade Hampton Miller
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2017, 05:26 PM
random works random works is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,756
Default

years ago I went to the local music store for an acoustic. The salesman handed me a Garrison which I played, looked inside at the plastic type bracing. I then asked him if I could play the Seagull S6 they had. He reluctantly said yes, but that the Garrison was really great. Although I was just getting into the acoustic guitar tone, I immediately played then bought the S6. The Garrison was okay, but the Seagull, to my ears we in another league.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2017, 06:31 PM
SimonFL SimonFL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
Default

I have a garrison. I think it's the G40 model but I'm not sure off the top of my head. I like it but I will say it has a unique sound. I've found it benefits allot from heavier strings. I've noticed a bigger difference in the sound of the guitar with different string gauges than with my other guitars. I'm not sure if it's the top or the bracing or both, but it seems to need the thicker strings to get the top moving.

It's a great live guitar. I've been able to dial in a sound that I'm very happy with.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-12-2017, 07:41 PM
ollaimh ollaimh is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 257
Default

i found a garrison g 50 made in new foundland(not nova scotia). solid rosewood back and sides spruce top with the carbon fibre bracing all around. it's a cannon.heavy on the bass, amazing for the gibson country sound . i think that's why gibson bought them. not balanced for finger picking--sort of like gibsons.

the chinese ones were not as good. a few of the lower models i have hears were just ok.

but for $150 if you like it buy it. i think the g 300 series were chinese made

griffiths made a lot of money in the buy out, a lot. i don't think he sold because he wasn't doing well. they were selling at the time. he now makes hand made stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-13-2017, 02:18 AM
MikeBodd MikeBodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jhb South Africa
Posts: 361
Default

Thanks for all the feedback. What you say makes a lot of sense Wade. But I'm thinking for $75, I can get something that plays pretty well and looks pretty to hang in the music room.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2017, 04:26 AM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeBodd View Post
Thanks for all the feedback. What you say makes a lot of sense Wade. But I'm thinking for $75, I can get something that plays pretty well and looks pretty to hang in the music room.
For $75 I'd buy it, too.


whm
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2017, 05:55 AM
Tony Burns Tony Burns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: middle of no where
Posts: 8,041
Default

Ive played one - not a bad guitar -
was impressed about the premade bracing -
guessing Gibson bought it to keep it out of someones hands.
Thinking that it might put under their Epiphone Gibson clones .
But that's just a "guess "
__________________
---------------------------------
Wood things with Strings !

Last edited by Kerbie; 03-13-2017 at 06:12 AM. Reason: Politics
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-17-2017, 11:13 AM
MikeBodd MikeBodd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jhb South Africa
Posts: 361
Default

Didn't get this. It was in a terrible condition.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=