#1
|
|||
|
|||
Yamaha LS 6/16 rosewood or mahogany?
Hi,
anyone tried both, the RW and mahogany versions? Are there real differences in sound? To be honest, I am more tempted to buy the 6 instead of 16, because it's easier with the humidity issues. I play mainly fingerstyle with bluesy feeling and I think the mahogany would fit better to this than RW. Yes, no? Thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
for 1 thing humidity issue should not be in the discussion unless you live some place like singapore. i always prefer solid wood over laminate but thats really a personal decision. i loved my ls16. wonderful guitar
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Dryness is the "problem", not too much of humidity. I realized that for the past year or so, I have mostly played my hollow electric guitar (without amp) just because it's nicely hanging on the wall and I can easily grab it and play. The acoustic is hidden in the case with a humidifier. Out of sight, out of mind. The laminated guitar would be easier... But of course this is not a major issue, it's just a minor annoyance. But, how about the sound between LS rosewood or mahogany for fingerpicking? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The difference is noticeable in the 16 series. Which is better? Depends on what you want. RW b&s provide a deeper bass and a zingier high end. They also have a noticeable amount of overtones - natural reverb, if you will. Very rich (& can sometimes be heard as dark too). Hog b&s will provide less overtones - more simple and straightforward tone. There is faster note decay and stronger midrange presence. If you like fast note decay, you may prefer Hog back and sides. Personally, I prefer all solid Mahogany or Sapele guitars for finger picking as nothing sounds off and decays quicker than a Hog top. Just depends on what your preferences are. IMO, the 16 series is worth the extra $ - even with humidification concerns. I say this, but am quite lucky that my own climate is a great fit for solid instruments so take it w/a grain of salt, I guess.
__________________
Roy Ibanez, Recording King, Gretsch, Martin G&L, Squier, Orange (x 2), Bugera, JBL, Soundcraft Our duo website - UPDATED 7/26/19 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I would go for the LS16 , but before you buy or order you must have a look at the new Transacoustic from Yamaha . Outstanding guitar for the money £750 approx , all solid wood as the LS16 with treated top but fitted with onboard reverb and chorus that can be used plugged in or just as an acoustic . For fingerpicking they sound fantastic Good luck
__________________
Martin OODB JT Gibson J45 Yamaha LLTA Yamaha SLG200S Yamaha NTX1200R Taylor GSMiniE Rosewood Joe Brown Uke AER Compact 60 Marshall AS50D Now 100% Acoustic and loving it ! No more GAS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I guess the question should be, if to buy LS6M or LS16M. I like the sound of mahogany back and sides. But it's a dilemma which to choose, because some tell that they don't hear any difference between 6/16 and some tell that they hear a huge difference I need to order the guitar, so I can't test before purchase. The LS6M can be found for 430e, the LS16M for 750e.
I used to have a older LL6 and I thought it was great in every way (except that I like more the mid focused sound of smaller bodies). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
There are some youtube videos comparing the 6 and 16 models. I have had the opportunity to compare at Sam Ash. They sound somewhat different, but I don't know that I would call one better--just different.
I went with the LS 6 basically for the same reason you mentioned above. I want a good sounding guitar that I can hang on the wall for easy access, but not have to worry much about humidity and all the other things guitar connoisseurs seem to worry about. I did not compare back and side material. My LS 6 is rosewood and it does sound "bright" . |