The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 02-18-2022, 08:51 AM
davenumber2 davenumber2 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glob View Post
The varnish gets aged pretty quickly anyway. Might work on a violin but on a guitar: scratches, discolorations, marks (from the bubble wrap!) all happen irrespective how careful you are.
I think that's the point.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-18-2022, 08:52 AM
davenumber2 davenumber2 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Glider View Post
Oh, I understand that, which is why I didn't say there wasn't a market for it or that it was a bad business decision. I just think people who buy such guitars tend to be posers...
Well you did say it was a shame Eastman decided to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-18-2022, 10:02 AM
Street Glider Street Glider is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pagedr View Post
Are people who buy well used vintage guitars posers as well?
There's a pronounced difference between a 40 year old guitar which has 40 years of wear and a one year old guitar which has 40 years of wear...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-18-2022, 10:03 AM
Street Glider Street Glider is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davenumber2 View Post
Well you did say it was a shame Eastman decided to do it.
And, from a philosophical standpoint, I believe it is.

From a business standpoint? Hey, if there are people waving around fistfuls of money to get one, it would be stupid of them not to...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-18-2022, 10:45 AM
davenumber2 davenumber2 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Glider View Post
There's a pronounced difference between a 40 year old guitar which has 40 years of wear and a one year old guitar which has 40 years of wear...
I tend to agree with this but one positive of a relic finish is that you don't have to worry about babying it and can just play without worrying about picking up a ding here or there.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-18-2022, 11:04 AM
Dan Boggs Dan Boggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Glider View Post
There's a pronounced difference between a 40 year old guitar which has 40 years of wear and a one year old guitar which has 40 years of wear...
I only play my antique varnish Eastman when I'm wearing these pants:

https://imgur.com/a/mAyU2ta

Guess that makes me a poser and a hoser (Canadian, eh).
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-18-2022, 11:13 AM
kizz kizz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
Default

I was in a guitarshop the other day and tried about 10-12 different Eastman models. I actually had high expectations since I've heard so many great stories about Eastman. I do not know if the quality has dropped, but out of the many Eastmans I tried there was only one that spoke just a little to me and it was an cheap ac122 jumbo size, the rest seemed seriously overbuilt, felt heavy and had a very thick polyfinish. I left the store quite disappointed, but wiser on Eastman guitars. I should not be able to say if an antique varnish look does anything better, but I doubt it, a bit like old wine in new bottles.
__________________
Jan
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=