The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:09 PM
Sordid Tales Sordid Tales is offline
do what huh?
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lone Star State of Mind
Posts: 312
Default Acoustic Bolt On Necks

New member, first post. I found this forum about 2 months ago while doing research on a 2007 Taylor 214ce that I just picked up. Anyway, having 7 years of guitar repair experience (I'm by no means the next Dan Erlewine, or a great builder)

Having had a collection of 14 acoustics total (now down to 5) I've noticed several things. But, it's also brought some questions that I cannot answer myself.

Right now my collection comprises of a 2007 Taylor 214ce, 08 Seagull S6 Cedar GT, 1975 Alvarez Yairi DY-75, 70's Sekova, and an Ibanez AEF20.

The Taylor and the Seagull are the brightest. I tend to like this, as they're not overly bright, but provide great clarity (and with Pho Bronze strings, good bass response). Here's the spinner, they both feature bolt on necks.

Now most people who are familiar with acoustics know of Taylor's NT (New Technology) Neck, and Seagull seems to have followed in their footsteps with almost the exact same construction (I've taken a few apart ) But they don't promote it much like Taylor does.

The Alvarez is the darkest of them all. I'm very compelled to say "muddy", but I believe that has to do with the fact that my ears have adjusted to the Taylor sound.

Unfortunately acoustics rely on so many small details to form their sound that it's almost impossible to compare one brand to another. Martin vs. Taylor vs. Lowden vs. Seagull vs. whoever else.

Here's my question. Is it unreasonable to form the opinion that bolt on neck acoustics give a brighter sound? It's almost glass like in clarity but still incredibly smooth (especially with Godin's Quantum II electronics).

Anyone else have an opinion?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:23 PM
billv's Avatar
billv billv is offline
Tryin' to figure it out
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 900
Default

In my opnion, the neck joint has little to do with the intrinsic brightness of the tone. I think that the woods, overall design and voicing of the guitar override any minor difference.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:24 PM
donh donh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sordid Tales View Post
Is it unreasonable to form the opinion that bolt on neck acoustics give a brighter sound?
Yes, that is unreasonable. There are too many other factors, and the neck attachement point is a tone-neutral position on the guitar.

The liveliest guitar i own is a set-neck, most of the rest are bolt-ons, and they are all lovely.
__________________
-donh-

*everything* is a tone control
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:25 PM
DenverSteve's Avatar
DenverSteve DenverSteve is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 11,893
Default

I haven't noticed that in my 40 years of playing - but never quite thought about it like that. Probably best left to be answered by builders here who have built both types of guitars and have an opinion based on empirical evidence. I'll watch for the opinions to roll in.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:40 PM
tagmike tagmike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 224
Default

There are some Martin people who will swear that they can hear a dramatic difference between dovetail (old school, and the method used on all high-end Martins) and the newer mortise-and-tenon neck attachments. I've also heard the difference in "punch" between Martin and Taylor attributed to the Taylor bolt-on neck.

This sounds dubious to me, and I've never talked to a luthier who believed it.

- mike
__________________
Mike Ball

Playing a resonator guitar is kind of like putting strings on a chrome-plated garbage can, then hitting it with a baseball bat - only it usually doesn't sound as good as that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2009, 09:54 PM
flaggerphil flaggerphil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 13,718
Default

I talked to Matthew Larrivee a couple of years ago when I toured the Oxnard plant...he gave me the tour personally. According to him, the type of neck attachment makes virtually no difference in sound, and no type of neck attachment is "better" than another. It's a builders personal preference.

FWIW.
__________________
Phil

Playing guitar badly since 1964.

Some Taylor guitars.
Three Kala ukuleles (one on tour with the Box Tops).
A 1937 A-style mandolin.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:02 PM
tagmike tagmike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 224
Default

Just a thought - wouldn't a bolt-on neck be a lot easier to reset?
__________________
Mike Ball

Playing a resonator guitar is kind of like putting strings on a chrome-plated garbage can, then hitting it with a baseball bat - only it usually doesn't sound as good as that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:06 PM
jwenting jwenting is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 805
Default

Haven't you heard, bolt-on necks are by definition a sign of poor quality!
Gibson lovers have been saying it for decades so it must be true!

Seriously, it probably has little or no effect if the neck is attached properly.
Of course, with low quality instruments usually having bolt-on necks because they're quicker to produce, it's quite possible that there is a difference between the average guitar with bolt-on neck versus the average guitar with set neck, simply because the averages in either class will sit in quite different market segments.
__________________
Tanglewood 170ASCE
Tanglewood 155AS
and some others
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2009, 10:07 PM
jwenting jwenting is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tagmike View Post
Just a thought - wouldn't a bolt-on neck be a lot easier to reset?
Could be. Though some (many?) manufacturers use both glue and bolts when bolting on a neck.
__________________
Tanglewood 170ASCE
Tanglewood 155AS
and some others
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-18-2009, 04:35 AM
Brackett Instruments Brackett Instruments is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grover NC
Posts: 5,154
Default

I used to think a bolt on neck was brighter but I was comparing Martin's and Gibson's to Taylor's and Collings. I don't think the neck joint affects the tone. My least favorite neck joint is a bolt on that still uses glue.
FWIW, I prefer dovetails. I use a hardware based dovetail on my guitars. It offers the strength and tradition of a Dovetail, but only takes a few minutes to remove the neck.

I recommend buying a guitar for the total package, not because of the neck joint, finish, or other small factors.
__________________
woody b politically incorrect since 1964
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-18-2009, 06:33 AM
Howard Emerson Howard Emerson is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Huntington Station, New York
Posts: 7,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sordid Tales View Post
New member, first post. I found this forum about 2 months ago while doing research on a 2007 Taylor 214ce that I just picked up. Anyway, having 7 years of guitar repair experience (I'm by no means the next Dan Erlewine, or a great builder)

Having had a collection of 14 acoustics total (now down to 5) I've noticed several things. But, it's also brought some questions that I cannot answer myself.

Right now my collection comprises of a 2007 Taylor 214ce, 08 Seagull S6 Cedar GT, 1975 Alvarez Yairi DY-75, 70's Sekova, and an Ibanez AEF20.

The Taylor and the Seagull are the brightest. I tend to like this, as they're not overly bright, but provide great clarity (and with Pho Bronze strings, good bass response). Here's the spinner, they both feature bolt on necks.

Now most people who are familiar with acoustics know of Taylor's NT (New Technology) Neck, and Seagull seems to have followed in their footsteps with almost the exact same construction (I've taken a few apart ) But they don't promote it much like Taylor does.

The Alvarez is the darkest of them all. I'm very compelled to say "muddy", but I believe that has to do with the fact that my ears have adjusted to the Taylor sound.

Unfortunately acoustics rely on so many small details to form their sound that it's almost impossible to compare one brand to another. Martin vs. Taylor vs. Lowden vs. Seagull vs. whoever else.

Here's my question. Is it unreasonable to form the opinion that bolt on neck acoustics give a brighter sound? It's almost glass like in clarity but still incredibly smooth (especially with Godin's Quantum II electronics).

Anyone else have an opinion?

Very unreasonable to think that any form of neck attachment has much at all to do with the sound of a guitar.

That doesn't stop the romantic notions, though.

HE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53PZkJsZ2t0 Playing a bolt-on Flammang maple/red spruce w/non-scalloped bracing
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-18-2009, 06:48 AM
fnesnor's Avatar
fnesnor fnesnor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwenting View Post
Could be. Though some (many?) manufacturers use both glue and bolts when bolting on a neck.
I know some builders use both. I have glued and bolted necks but no longer practice that. I think it defeats the purpose of a bolt on neck. Many other things like wood, bracing and top thickness...even the size of the hole effect the sound of a guitar. But not a good neck joint; bolt on or otherwise.
__________________
RonSenf


2023 Taylor AD22e
2001 Guild F47RCE

Certified Fretting Technician - Galloup School of Luthiery 2005
Guitar Builder/Tech
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:06 AM
keyshore keyshore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Goa, India
Posts: 925
Default

Hi sordid tales,

Welcome to ths wonderful forum.

IMHO the necks joints, bolt on or dovetailed have got no bearing on the sound of the guitar. The guitar sound is dependent on the voicing, bracing, wood selection and the general skill of the builder.

I have a Bourgeois OM which sounds heavenly and has a bolt on neck. Dana Bourgeois has a great system where the neck as well as the fingerboard extension is bolted, so if you unscrew 6 bolts the whole necks comes out and neck resets are a cinch.

some builders have bolt on necks and the fingerboard extentions are glued. Some offer both bolt on and dovetailed. Kevin gallagher is in this category. Some are only into the traditional dovetailed like Jim Olson and my Larrivee.

It depends om how the builder is set up. But to me bolt on necks is the way to go and i have guitars with both methods, there is no difference in sound.

Micheal Baskin, John Ostoff, Tom Doerr, Gerald Sheppard etc are all doing bolt on necks.

I do hope someday everybody shifts to bolt on necks.

Best,

Keyshore
__________________
1991 Ovation 1719 Custom Legend
2005 Takamine EF400SC 12 string
2007 Bourgeois Vintage OM Madagascar with Bone LB6
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:32 AM
tagmike tagmike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woody b View Post
I recommend buying a guitar for the total package, not because of the neck joint, finish, or other small factors.
... or wings, or bearclaw, or strap buttons, or... Well said, Woody.

- mike
__________________
Mike Ball

Playing a resonator guitar is kind of like putting strings on a chrome-plated garbage can, then hitting it with a baseball bat - only it usually doesn't sound as good as that.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:41 AM
donh donh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tagmike View Post
Just a thought - wouldn't a bolt-on neck be a lot easier to reset?
Absolutely!
__________________
-donh-

*everything* is a tone control
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=