The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-15-2016, 01:58 PM
PDXMike PDXMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
Default

While there are undeniably many similarities between these two guitars, I would in no way make the claim that the 322-12 fret is a 000-17SM killer! Each has its own unique tone, and the different bracing pattern on each will contribute to that. Furthermore, I would venture a guess that the person considering purchasing a 000-17SM is not the same person that's considering the 322-12 fret, simply because one will have a more "traditional" voicing and one will have a more "modern" voicing. Both are fantastic instruments, and each will have its own advocates.

On a side note, one could say that the real 000-17SM killer was C.F Martin IV, seeing as it was discontinued in 2016!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-15-2016, 02:15 PM
lodi_55 lodi_55 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Coast between San Francisco and Santa Cruz
Posts: 1,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper59 View Post
not even close. had the 522 which is even better but still a taylor. just mahogany. not even close in my opinion
Sorry, not sure what you're trying to say here. "Still a Taylor"?

BTW, I agree that the 322 SEB 12-fret is a very nice guitar.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-15-2016, 02:17 PM
PTC Bernie PTC Bernie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PTC GA
Posts: 4,537
Default Bto

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudy4 View Post
It's easy enough to order one without the electronics.
Yes, but the issue there is Taylor's use of, IMHO, aesthetically inferior woods. If I plunk my money down there's no guarantee that I won't have a big white stripe running through the ebony fingerboard or bear claw or some other issue. To me that's a deal killer. If I saw that in a guitar hanging in a shop I would pass on it just as quickly as the ones with the ES2 or other systems where there are holes all over the body. Right or wrong, that's just one of my criteria.

I don't say that to start the whole environmental debate, please don't go there. I'm just saying that there's a reason I've never bought a guitar that I haven't laid eyes and hands on.

I'll keep looking and when I find one that checks all the boxes I'll pull the trigger.

Again, I know I'm a picky old son of a gun and will readily admit it.

Last edited by PTC Bernie; 04-15-2016 at 02:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-15-2016, 03:03 PM
smurph1 smurph1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDXMike View Post
While there are undeniably many similarities between these two guitars, I would in no way make the claim that the 322-12 fret is a 000-17SM killer! Each has its own unique tone, and the different bracing pattern on each will contribute to that. Furthermore, I would venture a guess that the person considering purchasing a 000-17SM is not the same person that's considering the 322-12 fret, simply because one will have a more "traditional" voicing and one will have a more "modern" voicing. Both are fantastic instruments, and each will have its own advocates.

On a side note, one could say that the real 000-17SM killer was C.F Martin IV, seeing as it was discontinued in 2016!
You took the words right out of my mouth. I truly love the "warmth" of my 000-17SM. Not saying the Taylor is bad, but I'm a geezer who is still stuck in the 1970s.
__________________
Fender "58" Re-Issue American Precision Bass, , , 2014 Martin D-18, 2009 Rickenbacker 330 Mapleglo.. 1967 Fender Bassman with 2x12 Cabinet,.. Fender Tweed Lacquer Blues Junior.

"And I wonder, still I wonder, who'll stop the rain"?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-15-2016, 03:06 PM
slice slice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 101
Default

Both very nice IMO, but I preferred the 000-17SM, just sounded better to my ear.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-15-2016, 04:18 PM
ewalling ewalling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTC Bernie View Post
Yes, but the issue there is Taylor's use of, IMHO, aesthetically inferior woods. If I plunk my money down there's no guarantee that I won't have a big white stripe running through the ebony fingerboard or bear claw or some other issue. To me that's a deal killer...
I'm guessing that Pelham blue wouldn't cut it, either, right?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-15-2016, 05:29 PM
SpruceTop SpruceTop is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 12,357
Default

... and that Morado fingerboard on the Martin 000-17SM is so cool! The only thing better than that would be if the fingerboard was Richlite or that inferior striped-ebony like Taylor uses.
__________________
Martin HD-28 Sunburst/Trance M-VT Phantom
Martin D-18/UltraTonic
Adamas I 2087GT-8
Ovation Custom Legend LX
Guild F-212XL STD
Huss & Dalton TD-R
Taylor 717e
Taylor 618e
Taylor 614ce
Larrivee D-50M/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Blue Grass Special/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Sunburst
Larrivee C-03R TE/Trance M-VT Phantom
RainSong BI-DR1000N2
Emerald X20
Yamaha FGX5
Republic Duolian/Schatten NR-2

Last edited by SpruceTop; 04-15-2016 at 05:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-16-2016, 01:59 AM
cageyOne cageyOne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: TX
Posts: 165
Default

I remember when I cared about what a guitar looks like
__________________
dean alvarez martin
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-16-2016, 02:01 AM
cageyOne cageyOne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: TX
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slice View Post
Both very nice IMO, but I preferred the 000-17SM, just sounded better to my ear.
I thought the 17sm sounded better too
__________________
dean alvarez martin
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-16-2016, 09:20 AM
Kupuna50's Avatar
Kupuna50 Kupuna50 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,231
Default M vs T

Both are well built. No question.
The Martin has a more full tone than the Taylor, with a more pronounced bass response. Excellent for blues or gospel style music.
It's up to YOUR ear.
As for the 'holes' from the ES system - not a great idea from Taylor. I, too, wish they would offer something less intrusive.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-16-2016, 10:03 AM
ronbo ronbo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 600
Default

I would agree that the 000-17sm definitely has a lot of bass response, but my experience was that it was at the detriment to the table response...it was too dark for me. The way Taylor has done their mahogany guitars seems to be more balanced with a nice mix of bass and trebles. I have a 526 that is quickly becoming my favorite guitar, such a joy to play and sounds equally good to my ears playing it and listening to it. Had a buddy in the local bluegrass jam play it and he liked it a lot, but did comment that "It was still a Taylor..." he's funny that way
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=